Numerical Investigation of Circular Plates Deformation under Air Blast Wave

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 K. N. Toosi University of Technology

2 K.N. Toosi university of Technology

Abstract

In the current research the maximum deflection of circular plates made of AA5010 and AA1100 alloys under blast load was investigated. Shock waves were produced by exploding a spherical charge in different distances from the center of plates. The ABAQUS software uses conwep equation for blast loading analysis. It was found the results of these simulations have about 30% to 40% inaccuracy in comparison with experimental results. To improve the accuracy of the simulations the Friedlander equation was used that considers the positive phase of blast wave as exponential and the negative phase as bi-linear function. To this goal, the vdload subroutine was developed. Results were shown the difference between the experimental and simulation was decreased to 8%. Also, the effect of uniform and non-uniform shock waves on the deformation of structure and various types of failure were investigated. It was observed that uniform shock waves can be achieved when the minimum distance between the exploding charge and plate is about 3 times of the radius of plate.

Keywords


 
[1] F. W. Travis and W. Johnson, Experiments in the dynamic deformation of clamped circular sheets of various metals subject to an underwater explosive charge, Sheet Met. Indust, 39(1961) 456.
[2] W. Johnson, A. Poynton, H. Singh, and F. W. Travis, Experiments in the underwater explosive stretch forming of clamped circular blanks, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 8,4(1966) 237–270.
[3] C. P. Vendhan, K. Ramajeyathilagam and V. Bhujanga Rao, Non-linear transient dynamic response of rectangular plates under shock loading, Int. J. Impact Eng., 24, 10(2000) 999–1015.
[4] V. H. Balden and G. N. Nurick, Numerical simulation of the post-failure motion of steel plates subjected to blast loading, Int. J. Impact Eng., 32, 1(2005) 14–34.
[5] A. Neuberger, S. Peles and D. Rittel, Scaling the response of circular plates subjected to large and close-range spherical explosions. Part I: Air-blast loading, Int. J. Impact Eng., 34, 5(2007) 859–873.
[6] G. J. McShane, C. Stewart, M. T. Aronson, H. N. G. Wadley, N. A. Fleck and V. S. Deshpande, Dynamic rupture of polymer-metal bilayer plates, Int. J. Solids Struct., 45, 16(2008) 4407–4426.
[7] K. Narooei and A. Karimi Taheri, A study on sheet formability by a stretch-forming process using assumed strain FEM, J Eng Math, (2009) 311–324.
[8] M. S. Chafi, G. Karami and M. Ziejewski, Numerical analysis of blast-induced wave propagation using FSI and ALEmulti-material formulations, Int. J. Impact Eng., 36, 10(2009) 1269–1275. 
[9] A. Neuberger, S. Peles and D. Rittel, Springback of circular clamped armor steel plates subjected to spherical air-blast loading, International Journal of Impact Engineering, (2009) 53–60.
[10] G. S. Langdon, D. Karagiozova, M. D. Theobald, G. N. Nurick, G. Lu and R. P. Merrett, Fracture of aluminium foam core sacrificial cladding subjected to air-blast loading, Int. J. Impact Eng., 37, 6(2010) 638–651.
[11] J. Zamani, H. Shariati, A. Gamsari and A. Sheykhi, Effect of strain rate on the circular plate under dynamic loading by introducing a dynamic rather than static failure, J. Energ. Mater., 10, 2(2011).
[12] M. D. Goel, V. A. Matsagar and A. K. Gupta, Dynamic Response of Stiffened Plates under Air Blast, Int. J. Prot. Struct., 2, 1(2011) 139–156.
[13] P. Kumar, D. S. Stargel and A. Shukla, Effect of plate curvature on blast response of carbon composite panels, Compos. Struct., 99(2013) 19–30.
[14] K. Spranghers, I. Vasilakos, D. Lecompte, H. Sol and J. Vantomme, Numerical simulation and experimental validation of the dynamic response of aluminum plates under free air explosions, International Journal of Impact Engineering, (2013) 83-95.
[15] P. Longere, A. Greza, B. Leble and A. Dragon, Ship structure steel plate failure under near-field air blast loading: Numerical simulations vs experiment, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 62(2013) 88-98.
[16] H. R. Tavakoli and F. Kiakojouri, Numerical dynamic analysis of stiffened plates under blast loading, Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct., 11, 2(2014) 185–199.
[17] E. Sitnikova, Z.W. Guan, G.K Schleyer and W.J. Cantwell, Modelling of perforation in fiber metal laminates subjected to high impulsive blast loading, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 51(2014) 3135-3145.
[18] N. Jha and B.S. Kumar, Air blast validation using ANSYS/AUTODYN, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 3, 1(2014).
[19] E.A. Flores-Johnson, L. Shen, L. Guiamatsia and G.D. Nguyen, A numerical study of bioinspired nacre-like composite plates under blast loading, Composite structures, 126(2015) 329-336.
[20] K. Micallef, A.S. Fallah, P.T. Curtis and L.A. Louca, On the dynamic plastic response of steel membranes subjected to localised blast loading, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 89(2016) 25-37.
[21] M. Larcher, Simulation of the Effects of an Air Blast Wave, I-21020 Ispra, Italy, JRC Tech Notes, (2007) 4-17.
[22] G. F. Kinney and K. J. Graham, Explosive shocks in air, (1985) Second Edition 282, Berlin and New York, Springer-Verlag.
[23] T. Belytschko, W. Liu and B. Moran, Nonlinear finite elements s for continua and structures, (2000) Fourth Edition, 609-615,england: wiley.
[24] A. E. El Mokadem, A. S. Wifi and I. Salama, A study on the UNDEX cup forming, 37, 2(2009) pp. 556–562.
[25] G. Tiwari, M. A. Iqbal and P. K. Gupta, Influence of Target Convexity and Concavity on the Ballistic Limit of Thin Aluminum Plate against by, 6, 3(2013) 365–372.
[26] S. Menkes and H. Opat, Broken beams, Eperimental Mechanics, 13, 11(1973) pp. 480-486.
[27] N. Jones, Structural impact (2011) Cambridge University Press.
[28] R. Rajendran and J. M. Lee, Blast loaded plates, Marine Stractures, 22(2009) 99–127.
[29] E. Borenstein and H. Benaroya, Loading and structural response model of circular plate subjected to near field explosions, Journal of sound and Vibration, 332(2013) 1725–1753.