A Robust RBF-ANN Model to Predict the Hot Deformation Flow Curves of API X65 Pipeline Steel

Document Type : Research Paper


Department of Mechanical Engineering, Birjand University of Technology, POBOX 97175-569, Birjand, Iran


In this research, a radial basis function artificial neural network (RBF-ANN) model was developed to predict the hot deformation flow curves of API X65 pipeline steel. The results of the developed model was compared with the results of a new phenomenological model that has recently been developed based on a power function of Zener-Hollomon parameter and a third order polynomial function of strain power m (m is a constant). Root mean square error (RMSE) criterion was used assess the prediction performance of the investigated models. According to the results obtained, it was shown that the RBF-ANN model has a better performance than that of the investigated phenomenological model. Very low RMSE value of 0.41 MPa was obtained for RBF-ANN model that shows the robustness of it to predict the hot deformation flow curves of tested steel. The results can be further used in mathematical simulation of hot metal forming processes.


[1] G.R. Johnson and W.H. Cook, "A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on ballistics, (1983) 541–543.
[2] E. Voce, The relationship between stress and strain for homogeneous deformation. J. Inst. Met., 74 (1948) 537–562.
[3] A.S. Khan and S. Huang, Experimental and theoretical study of mechanical behavior of 1100 aluminum in the strain rate range 10−5− 104 s−1, Int. J. Plast., 8 (1992) 397–424.
[4] H. Mirzadeh and A. Najafizadeh, Flow stress prediction at hot working conditions, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 527(2010) 1160–1164.
[5] Y.C. Lin and X.M. Chen, A critical review of experimental results and constitutive descriptions for metals and alloys in hot working, Mater. Des., 32 (2011) 1733–1759.
[6] H. Shi, A.J. McLaren, C.M. Sellars, R. Shahani and R. Bolingbroke, Constitutive equations for high temperature flow stress of aluminium alloys, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 13 (1997) 210-216.
[7] Y.C. Lin, M.S. Chen and J. Zhang, Constitutive modeling for elevated temperature flow behavior of 42CrMo steel, Comput Mater Sci, 424 (2008) 470–477.
[8] M.Y. Zhan, Z. Chen, H. Zhang and W. Xia, Flow stress behavior of porous FVS0812 aluminum alloy during hot-compression, Mech. Res. Commun., 33 (2006) 508–514.
[9] P.J. Zerilli and R.W. Armstrong, Dislocation-mechanics-based constitutive relations for material dynamics calculations, J. Appl. Phys., 61 (1987) 1816-1825.
[10] G.Z. Voyiadjis and A.H. Almasri, A physically based constitutive model for FCC metals with applications to dynamic hardness, Mech. Mater., 40 (2008) 549-563.
[11] Y.C. Lin, M.S. Chen and J. Zhang, Prediction of 42CrMo steel flow stress at high temperature and strain rate, Mech. Res.Commun., 35 (2008) 142–50.
[12] Y.C. Lin, X.M. Chen, D.X. Wen and M.S. Chen, A physically-based constitutive model for a typical nickel-based superalloy, Comput. Mater. Sci., 83(2014) 282–289.
[13] M. Rakhshkhorshid and S.A. TeimouriSendesi, Bayesian Regularization Neural Networks for Prediction of Austenite Formation Temperatures (Ac1 and Ac3), J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 21(2) (2014) 246 – 251.
[14] V. Senthilkumar and A. Balaji, D. Arulkirubakaran, Application of constitutive and neural network models for prediction of high temperature flow behavior of Al/Mg based nanocomposite, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 23 (2013) 1737-1750.
[15] Y. Zhu, W. Zeng, Y. Sun, F. Feng and Y. Zhou, Artificial neural network approach to predict the flow stress in the isothermal compression of as-cast TC21 titanium alloy, Comp. Mater. Sci., 50 (2011) 1785– 1790.
[16] H. Mirzadeh, J.M. Cabrera, J.M. Prado and A. Najafizadeh, Modeling and prediction of hot deformation flow curves, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 43 (2012) 108–123.
[17] N. Haghdadi, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, A.R. Khalesian and H.R. Abedi, Artificial neural network modeling to predict the hot deformation behavior of an A356 aluminum alloy, Mater. Des., 49 (2013) 386-391.
[18] Y.C. Lin, X. Fang and Y.P. Wang, Prediction of metadynamic softening in a multi-pass hot deformed low alloy steel using artificial neural network, Mater. Sci., 43 (2008) 5508-5515.
[19] N.S. Reddy, Y.H. Lee, C.H. Park and C.S. Lee, Prediction of flow stress in Ti–6Al–4V alloy with an equiaxed [alpha]+[beta] microstructure by artificial neural networks, Mater. Sci. Eng.A, 492 (2008) 276- 282.
[20] H.Y. Li, D.D. Wei, Y.H. Li and X.F. Wang, Application of artificial neural network and constitutive equations to describe the hot compressive behavior of 28CrMnMoV steel, Mater. Des., 35 (2012) 557-562.
[21] S. Toros, F. Ozturk, Flow curve prediction of Al–Mg alloys under warm forming conditions at various strain rates by ANN, Appl. Soft. Comput., 110 (2011) 1891–1898.
[22] S. Mandal, P.V. Sivaprasad, S. Venugopal and K.P.N. Murthy, Artificial neural network modeling to evaluate and predict the deformation behavior of stainless steel type AISI 304L during hot torsion, Appl. Soft. Comput., 9 (2009) 237–244.
[23] M. Rakhshkhorshid, Modeling the hot deformation flow curves of API X65 pipeline steel, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., 77 (2015) 203-210.
[24] M. Rakhshkhorshid and A.R. Maldar, A comparative study on constitutive modeling of hot deformation flow curves in AZ91 magnesium alloy, Iranian journal of materials Forming, 3(1) (2016) 27-37.
[25] M. Rakhshkhorshid and S.H. Hashemi, Experimental study of hot deformation behavior in API X65 steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 573 (2013) 37–44.
[26] API Specifications 5L, Specifications for Line Pipe, 44th Edition, American Petroleum Institute, USA (2007).
[27] M.S. Ozerdem and S. Kolukisa, Artificial neural network approach to predict the mechanical properties of Cu–Sn–Pb–Zn–Ni cast alloys, Mater. Des., 30 (2009), 764–769.
[28] M. Zounemat-kermani, O. Kisi and T. Rajaee, Performance of radial basis and LM-feed forward artificial neural networks for predicting daily watershed run off, Appl. Soft. Comput., 13 (2013) 4633– 4644.
[29] S. Garg, S.K. Pal and D. Chakraborty, Evaluation of the performance of backpropagation and radial basis function neural networks in predicting the drill flank wear, Neural Comput. &Applic., 16 (2007) pp. 407–417.
[30] .A. Mehrsai, H.R. Karimi, K.D. Thoben and B. Scholz-Reiter, Application of learning pallets for real- time scheduling by the use of radial basis function network, Neurocomputing, 101 (2013) 82–93.
[31] M. Rakhshkhorshid and S.H. Hashemi, Firefly algorithm assisted optimized NN to predict the elongation of API X65 pipeline steel, IJMMNO, 4(3) (2013), 238 – 251.
[32] MATLAB® software (2008) (Neural Network Toolbox, User's Guide)
[33] H. Sarnel and Y. Senol, Accurate and robust image registration based on radial basis neural networks, Neural Comput.&Applic., 20 (2011) 1255–1262.