Effect of Tool Rotational and Welding Speed on the Mixed Mode Fracture Strength of Dissimilar Friction Stir Welded Aluminum Alloys

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Bonab, Bonab, Iran

2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran

Abstract

In the friction stir welding (FSW) process, a special rotating tool is used for welding different parts without utilizing any electrode as filler material. By rotating the cylindrical tool and sinking it into the line of connection between two parts, friction and disturbance are created, and at the same time, heat and pressure also rise to prepare the conditions for the welding. During the last two decades, a large number of research has been carried out to investigate the mechanical properties and microstructure of joints made from several similar and dissimilar alloys. Crack growth resistance of such joints under tensile, shear and mixed loading is an important design parameter to evaluate the lifetime of welded parts in friction stir welding, while there is limited research on combined mode I/II in FSW welding. To fill this research gap, in this research tensile and fracture strength in dissimilar FSW welding of AA5083/AA5052 aluminum alloys are investigated experimentally. For this purpose, two pin diameters, three pin rotation speeds and welding speeds have been selected as welding variable parameters. After carrying out the welding, the tensile and cracked mixed mode fracture tests were performed to determine the effect of considered parameters on the tensile and fracture strength of the joint. The results showed that the biggest tensile and fracture strength happens in different tool rotation and welding speeds for different loading angles (fracture modes).

Keywords


[1] Gabor, R., & Dos Santos, J. F. (2013). Friction stir welding development of aluminium alloys for structural connections. Proceedings of the Romanian Academy, Series A, 14(1), 64-71.
[2] Esmaeili, A., Rajani, H. Z., Sharbati, M., Givi, M. B., & Shamanian, M. (2011). The role of rotation speed on intermetallic compounds formation and mechanical behavior of friction stir welded brass/aluminum 1050 couple. Intermetallics, 19(11), 1711-1719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2011.07.006
[3] Bisadi, H., Tavakoli, A., Sangsaraki, M. T., & Sangsaraki, K. T. (2013). The influences of rotational and welding speeds on microstructures and mechanical properties of friction stir welded Al5083 and commercially pure copper sheets lap joints. Materials & Design, 43, 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.029
[4] Park, J. C., & Kim, S. J. (2010). The effect of traveling and rotation speeds on mechanical properties during friction stir welding of dissimilar Al alloys. Defect and Diffusion Forum, 297, 590-595. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.297-301.590
[5] Park, S. K., Hong, S. T., Park, J. H., Park, K. Y., Kwon, Y. J., & Son, H. J. (2010). Effect of material locations on properties of friction stir welding joints of dissimilar aluminium alloys. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 15(4), 331-336.
https://doi.org/10.1179/136217110X12714217309696
[6] Abdollah-Zadeh, A., Saeid, T., & Sazgari, B. (2008). Microstructural and mechanical properties of friction stir welded aluminum/copper lap joints. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 460(1-2), 535-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.06.009
[7] Lee, C. Y., Lee, W. B., Kim, J. W., Choi, D. H., Yeon, Y. M., & Jung, S. B. (2008). Lap joint properties of FSWed dissimilar formed 5052 Al and 6061 Al alloys with different thickness. Journal of Materials Science, 43, 3296-3304.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2525-1
[8] RajKumar, V., VenkateshKannan, M., Sadeesh, P., Arivazhagan, N., & Ramkumar, K. D. (2014). Studies on effect of tool design and welding parameters on the friction stir welding of dissimilar aluminium alloys AA 5052–AA 6061. Procedia Engineering, 75, 93-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.11.019
[9] Ravikumar, S. Rao,V. S. Pranesh, R.V. (2014). Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties of friction stir welded dissimilar materials between AA6061-T651 and AA7075-T651 alloys, International Journal of Advanced Mechanical Engineering. 4(1), 101-114.
[10] Al-Roubaiy, A. O., Nabat, S. M., & Batako, A. D. (2014). Experimental and theoretical analysis of friction stir welding of Al–Cu joints. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 71, 1631-1642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5563-z
[11] Xue, P., Xiao, B. L., Ni, D. R., & Ma, Z. Y. (2010). Enhanced mechanical properties of friction stir welded dissimilar Al–Cu joint by intermetallic compounds. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 527(21-22), 5723-5727.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.05.061
[12] Cavaliere, P., DeSantis, A., Panella, F., & Squillace, A. (2009). Effect of welding parameters on mechanical and microstructural properties of dissimilar AA6082–AA2024 joints produced by friction stir welding. Materials & Design, 30(3), 609-616. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.1163
[13] Firouzdor, V., & Kou, S. (2012). Al-to-Cu friction stir lap welding. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 43, 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-011-0822-9
[14] Mehta, K. P., & Badheka, V. J. (2015). Influence of tool design and process parameters on dissimilar friction stir welding of copper to AA6061-T651 joints. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 80, 2073-2082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7176-1
[15] Torabi, A. R., Kalantari, M. H., & Aliha, M. R. M. (2018). Fracture analysis of dissimilar Al‐Al friction stir welded joints under tensile/shear loading. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 41(9), 2040-2053. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12841
[16] Nishida, H., Ogura, T., Hatano, R., Kurashima, H., Fujimoto, M., & Hirose, A. (2017). Fracture toughness and fatigue crack behaviour of A3003/SUS304 lap friction stir welded joints. Welding International, 31(4), 268-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/09507116.2016.1223206